Address:
Uskudar Icerenkoy Yolu Cad. No:21
Atasehir, Istanbul 34752
TURKIYE
Working Hours:
Monday - Friday: 9:00 - 18:30
Weekends: Closed

Patent rights represent valuable commercial assets that require effective and timely protection against unauthorized use. In competitive markets, delays in enforcing intellectual property rights may cause irreparable damage to patent holders, including loss of market share, reputational harm, and diminished economic value. Within this framework, a patent preliminary injunction serves as a critical legal remedy under Turkish patent law, enabling rights holders to prevent ongoing or imminent patent infringement before a final court decision is issued.
At Akkas & Associates Law Firm, a leading full-service intellectual property law firm based in Istanbul, Turkey, we have provided comprehensive legal services in patent prosecution, patent enforcement, and patent litigation since 1992.
Table of Contents
A patent preliminary injunction is a temporary court order designed to prevent or stop acts that allegedly constitute patent infringement while a substantive case is pending. This remedy plays a central role in patent enforcement by preserving the status quo and protecting the economic interests of the patent holder during patent litigation proceedings.
Under Turkish patent law, preliminary injunctions are governed primarily by the Industrial Property Code No. 6769 and the Turkish Code of Civil Procedure. These provisions empower courts to grant urgent protective measures where delay could result in irreparable harm or where enforcement of rights may become impossible or substantially difficult without immediate intervention.
The rationale behind a patent preliminary injunction is to prevent further damage before the court resolves the merits of the dispute. Because patent disputes often involve technical products, complex technologies, and rapidly evolving markets, interim protection frequently determines the practical outcome of a case.

The Industrial Property Code provides patent owners with strong enforcement tools, including the right to request injunctive relief against unauthorized production, sale, importation, or use of patented inventions. Courts evaluate preliminary injunction requests by examining whether the claimant has demonstrated a credible claim of patent infringement and whether urgent protection is necessary.
Turkish courts may issue preliminary injunctions before or during patent litigation. The applicant may request such relief independently or in conjunction with a main infringement action. The legal framework also allows the court to order measures such as seizure of infringing goods, suspension of production activities, or prevention of distribution channels.
To obtain a patent preliminary injunction in Turkey, the applicant must satisfy specific legal criteria. Courts conduct a careful assessment to balance the rights of the patent holder against the interests of the alleged infringer.
The applicant must demonstrate prima facie evidence that patent infringement has occurred or is likely to occur. This does not require full proof of infringement but requires sufficient technical and legal evidence to establish a strong presumption of rights violation.
Technical expert reports, product analyses, and patent claim comparisons often play a crucial role in establishing infringement. Turkish patent attorneys typically assist in preparing technical evaluations that support the injunction request.
The court must be convinced that failure to grant the injunction would result in harm that cannot be adequately compensated through monetary damages. Examples include loss of market exclusivity, damage to reputation, or irreversible competitive disadvantage.
The applicant must show that immediate judicial intervention is required. If the court determines that the applicant delayed seeking relief without justification, it may reject the request.
Turkish courts generally require the applicant to provide a financial guarantee to compensate the defendant for potential damages if the injunction is later found unjustified. This safeguard ensures fairness in the patent enforcement process.





Patent preliminary injunction proceedings follow a structured legal process designed to ensure procedural fairness and judicial efficiency.
The patent holder submits a petition to the competent Intellectual and Industrial Property Rights Court. The petition must include detailed information regarding the patent, evidence of infringement, legal grounds, and justification for urgent protection.
The court may review the request based on written submissions or conduct a hearing. In urgent cases, the court may issue an ex parte injunction without hearing the defendant, particularly where advance notice could undermine the effectiveness of the measure.
The court evaluates technical evidence, legal arguments, and expert opinions. Given the complexity of patent disputes, courts frequently appoint independent experts to assess whether the allegedly infringing product falls within the scope of the patent claims.
If granted, the court specifies the scope and duration of the injunction. Enforcement authorities may seize infringing goods, halt manufacturing activities, or prevent commercial distribution.
The defendant has the right to challenge the injunction by filing an objection. The court reassesses the conditions for granting the measure and may modify or revoke the decision.
A patent preliminary injunction represents one of the most powerful tools available in patent enforcement strategies. Because patent disputes often involve time-sensitive market dynamics, interim measures can effectively determine commercial outcomes.
Immediate judicial intervention can prevent competitors from capturing market share, protect technological investments, and strengthen the patent holder’s negotiating position in settlement discussions. In many cases, obtaining a preliminary injunction creates significant pressure on alleged infringers to cease unauthorized activities or reach a licensing agreement.
Furthermore, the availability of injunctive relief enhances the overall effectiveness of Turkish patent law by reinforcing the exclusivity granted by patent rights.
Patent preliminary injunction proceedings are closely linked to broader patent litigation processes. Although the injunction is temporary, it typically precedes or accompanies a substantive infringement lawsuit.
The primary purpose of patent litigation is to determine whether patent infringement has occurred and to award remedies such as damages or permanent injunctions. A preliminary injunction, by contrast, provides interim protection while the court evaluates the merits of the case.
Defendants frequently respond to injunction requests by challenging the validity of the patent. Claims of patent invalidation or patent nullity may influence the court’s assessment of whether the patent holder has a credible claim.
If substantial doubts exist regarding the validity of the patent, courts may hesitate to grant preliminary relief. Therefore, patent holders must ensure strong patent prosecution practices and robust patent portfolios before seeking enforcement measures.

Patent preliminary injunction proceedings involve complex technical and legal issues that require specialized expertise. Turkish patent attorneys play a critical role in preparing technical evidence, conducting claim analyses, and coordinating expert evaluations.
Their involvement extends beyond litigation support to include strategic advice during patent prosecution, ensuring that patents are drafted with enforceability in mind. Strongly drafted patent claims increase the likelihood of obtaining injunctive relief in enforcement proceedings.
Experienced legal counsel also assists in managing procedural requirements, preparing persuasive arguments, and navigating interactions with the court and expert panels.
Evidence forms the foundation of any successful patent preliminary injunction request. Courts rely heavily on technical documentation, expert opinions, and comparative analyses of patented inventions and allegedly infringing products.
Expert reports typically address the scope of patent claims, technical features of the accused product, and the likelihood of infringement. Because Turkish courts may appoint independent experts, the quality and clarity of technical submissions significantly influence the outcome of proceedings.
Patent holders should ensure that all documentation is comprehensive, scientifically accurate, and clearly aligned with the legal requirements for injunctive relief.
While a patent preliminary injunction offers powerful protection, it also involves certain risks and challenges. Courts exercise caution when granting interim measures, recognizing the potential economic impact on defendants.
One significant risk is the requirement to provide security. If the court later determines that the injunction was unjustified, the applicant may be liable for damages incurred by the defendant.
Additionally, complex technical assessments and validity challenges may complicate proceedings. Patent holders must carefully evaluate the strength of their claims and the likelihood of success before initiating enforcement actions.
Once granted, a patent preliminary injunction is enforceable through judicial authorities. Enforcement measures may include seizure of infringing goods, suspension of production activities, and prevention of commercial distribution.
Failure to comply with a court-ordered injunction may result in legal penalties and additional liability. Effective enforcement ensures that patent rights remain meaningful and that unauthorized activities cease promptly.
Patent preliminary injunction proceedings in Turkey may have broader international implications, particularly for multinational companies. Because patent rights are territorial, enforcement strategies must consider parallel proceedings in other jurisdictions.
Companies operating in global markets often coordinate enforcement actions across multiple countries to protect intellectual property assets. Turkey’s strong legal framework and strategic geographic position make it an important jurisdiction for international patent enforcement strategies.

A patent preliminary injunction is a temporary court order that prevents alleged patent infringement before a final judgment. It is important because it protects patent holders from ongoing harm, preserves market exclusivity, and supports effective patent enforcement during litigation.
To obtain a patent preliminary injunction, the patent holder must demonstrate a likelihood of patent infringement, risk of irreparable harm, urgency, and legal justification. Courts also typically require a financial guarantee as security.
A patent preliminary injunction generally remains effective until the court issues a final decision in the underlying patent litigation or until the court modifies or revokes the measure upon objection.
Yes. The defendant may object to the injunction and challenge the validity of the patent through patent invalidation or patent nullity claims. The court reviews the objection and may reassess the decision.
Yes. Courts consider the validity of the patent when evaluating whether to grant preliminary relief. Strong patent prosecution and well-drafted claims increase the likelihood of obtaining injunctive protection.
Turkish patent attorneys provide technical analysis, prepare expert reports, assist in claim interpretation, and support patent enforcement strategies. Their expertise enhances the effectiveness of injunction proceedings.
Akkas & Associates Law Firm is a premier, full-service intellectual property law firm headquartered in Istanbul, Turkey, with over three decades of comprehensive IP law expertise dating back to 1992.
Selcuk Akkas, Attorney at Law, Patent & Trademark Attorney & Mediator
Akkas & Associates Law Firm provides comprehensive legal services in patent prosecution, patent enforcement, and patent litigation in Turkey. Our experienced team of intellectual property professionals and Turkish patent attorneys delivers strategic guidance in patent preliminary injunction proceedings, helping clients protect valuable innovations and maintain competitive advantage in dynamic markets.
If you are facing patent infringement concerns or require urgent protection of your intellectual property rights, our firm offers tailored legal solutions based on decades of experience in Turkish patent law. Contact Akkas & Associates Law Firm to receive expert assistance with patent preliminary injunction strategies, enforcement actions, and comprehensive intellectual property protection in Turkey.